Man, I love talkin' to Skip, my road warrior homie from the drrty souf. We always manage to get all intellekchul on poker stuff. Had a convo yesterday on table image, and how you can exploit it, as well as how you can be exploited. Talked about playing styles and how long it takes to establish an image based on your style, and be confident enough to use peoples' perceptions of you to your advantage.
We talked about "switching gears"; adjusting to different table or game textures. Tight game? Play it a certain way. Loosey goosey, play a certain way. Maniacal? Get drunk and let the dice roll.
Or do we start out tight and loosen up? Or vice versa? Confuse the heck outta the poor suckas who laid their money down?
Well, it ain't that easy, IMO. There's no formula to profitable poker. There is a "feel" to profitable poker, an intuition, a "force", that grooves a person. But it takes time to get there. I'm not arrogant enough to think I'm there yet, but I believe I'm beginning to sniff around the edges of that nirvana.
Must be the
diao gung.
We're all aware of just how looong it really takes to play poker. I'm
not talkin' bout 36-hour marathon sessions, I'm talkin' bout poker "careers". It takes a long time (and lotsa money) to learn the rudiments, a long time to get comfy in uncomfortable scenarios, a long time to face the multitude of situations you need to face to be comfy at the felt.
And the continuous learning component of the game is, of course, a lifelong exercise.
It also takes a real long time let your adequate bankroll (see a few posts below) do its work and start to beat the variance that a random shuffle brings into the game, and the very unpredictable nature of playing tables with strangers, novices, fish, sharks, dudes with shades, dudes with guns.
It takes a long time to establish a credible table image and to work the people you play with into pidgeonholing you into a category. "Nick's tight-aggresive", or "Nick's tight-weak", or "Nick's a loose cannon and not only will he reraise my 5xBB raise with (his) garbage, but he'll also bust out his glock if I try to reraise him".
You can't announce these tags. You can't label yourself. You can't just put on a T-Shirt that says, "I play just like Doyle" and expect people to believe you. You just gotta play a certain way for a buncha time against a buncha people, and word'll get around.
What's the point? I humbly believe beginning players (which I used to
arbitrarily define as those who've played fewer than 500 "thinking" hands of real money poker, but which I now arbitrarily define as those who've played under 1000 such hands) ought to consistently stick to a naturally comfortable style before trying, in one session, to flip a switch from Hansen mode to Andy Bloch mode. You can, and it'll be fun (if you know what the hell you're doing), but it won't be psychologically effective and credible enough to earn you big profits.
Case in point. I was watching my wife, Barbie, play an online SNG yesterday. Barb plays on 1 site regularly, and has spent the
last six months at an average of 6 hours a day cultivating a particular image on that site, with the people she regularly plays. That image was full-on
Rock. Tighter than a convent. Only played the nuts. Only showed down monsters and high percentage hands. Well, she's always been aware that style would only eke out a small profit or only break even long term. But she's now switched it up, and is getting full value for her six month investment.
Here's an analyzable hand.
Table: NL Holdem SNG, 6 players remaining, Stakes 50/100
Barbie: 3-3 in the BB
Dude Barbie Owned (DBO): KK in mid
2 limpers, coupla folds
DBO min-raises.
Barbie calls min-raise with her 3-3, hoping to hit a set.
1 limper calls.
rest fold
Flop: 6-6-4
Barbie leads out for T200.
last limper folds
DBO: Raises to T400
Without batting a virtual eyelash, Barbie reraises all-in, committing all her chips, cuz DBO had her covered.
DBO pauses, and types in the chatbox:
"ahh...barbie - you didn't wanna do that"
Barb types (quickly-she already had this pre-typed, I bet)
"you're facing the very worst pp your Big Pair can face"
He thinks some more, and folds, saying, "gotta lay down my kings to your sixes", or something like that.
Barb mucks.
I hit her up immediately on MSN, asking her if she really had the sixes. She tells me she had threes.
She used her jedi mind trick to make buddy fold with KK, when he had her destroyed. Her 3-3 now became a damn profitable hand.
That move would not have been possible without 6 months of image cultivation. That guy was convinced she had the quad sixes. He wouldn't have layed down to me, or you.
Table image cultivation takes time. Lots of time. You have to invest money and foregone profits. But when you're established and labeled in the minds of your opponents, you can make big money with 3-3 against KK. You'll no longer need the computer to blow up the Death Star.
Barb, you have strong kung fu. I'm forever your apprentice.