Before it's too late...
Ok, this time last year, we had some home games and no games. Today, we have ring games and tourneys in a casino, home games all over the place, tournament directors proposing and running tourneys. Poker on TV, poker on the brain.
I wanna talk a bit out the tournament scene. Why? Cuz it's always gonna be the sexiest and most accessible segment of poker life. Compared to the cash game side, where time commitment and bankroll are major considerations, tournaments give more folks the opportunity to participate with relatively little downside and significant upside. With tournaments being held "above-ground" now, it's likely we'll see plenty of these this year. Cash tourneys, satellites, super-satellites, fund-raisers, you name it.
With all this action, Tournament Directors/Organizers and the casinos can run the risk of making players' heads spin. With increasing player sophistication, Tourney Directors ought to work out some level of uniformity in the way individual events are conducted. I'm talking about rules, structuring philosophies, staff training, payout structures.
I can hear some tourney directors saying, "Well, it's my tournament, so people are just gonna have to play by my rules." Ok, point taken, things like buy-ins, formats and starting stacks are always gonna be unique to some extent. No problems there. But what about the basic rules for a poker tournament (whatever flavor of poker we're talking about).
Rules: I've seen a hodgepodge of ruling made in the last little while. What happens to dealer-exposed holecards, prematurely dealt cards, etc. Man I've seen some interesting rulings. Well, the answers to all these questions are available. Look at the Tournament Directors Association ruleset. Have a look at the established rules of poker to guide your decisions.
With respect to payouts, it's gonna get messy when players watch some of us rake 10% of the pot, some 20% of the pot, some 70% of the pot. I've heard of some rebuys run locally where none of the rebuy money found its way into the prize pool. Where the hell did it go? And why did the players not say anything? Did they not know any better? Perhaps. Did they not care? Perhaps. But they should have known that that's certainly not kosher in most legitimate tournaments worldwide.
These are just a few top-of-mind issues I've personally come across. I'm sure there's more.
The key is, in my humble estimation, to create a Philippine equivalent to the TDA in the US. This will allow serious and scrupulous Tournament Directors to have an umbrella "seal" under which to operate. Marco A., a good friend and legitimate tournament dude, suggested a logo, a seal, that can be used in conjunction with member directors' marketing efforts for their individual events. Such an identifier will provide players with peace of mind that generally accepted principles and rules are to be used for a given competition. I think this is a great idea that supports an ideal that places players first. This is one critical way in which this industry can standardize and grow.
two cents lang...